Tuesday, February 15, 2011

Meek, Not Silent

            You might think post-modernism has made way for a lot more free-thinking, but in that you would be wrong.  While the post-modernist movement has encouraged people to think for themselves, it has also made way for loud people to suppress everyone else.  For those of you who don’t know what post-modernism is, it revolves around the idea that everyone is right in their own mind; for example: “to each his own” is a very post-modernist idea.  So what you end up with are a few blowhards who get people excited about an idea that may or may not be good and, in fact, suppress free thought.  And why is this happening?  Because the idea that everyone is entitled to their own opinion has turned out to be entitlement to believe you are right in all things.

            While I don’t particularly agree with the idea of post-modernism, the basic idea of it and I share a common goal: to get people thinking.  Now post-modernism aims itself at the thought that everyone is right; just only personally.  Unfortunately, what this fails to address is how incomprehensibly ignorant and stubborn people can be.  People, in fact, are not always right.  I’m not trying to force the idea of “one truth” on you, but I am saying that people can stick to some highly destructive ideas.  The apparent goal of post-modernism is to get people to listen to each other.  The idea I propose is simply respecting each other.  Be civil when discussing things.  Why I think we have come to the point of suppressing free though is because people no longer respect different ideas because they’re right.  Thus, people start yelling and pit each other further into their particular idea of right and wrong. 

            One of the worst side effects of the post-modernist movement is the shunning of arguments.  Since people have become less civil, the definition of “argument” has changed from a debating discourse to people yelling at each other.  So what we get anymore is extremists overwhelming the world with their ideas and functioning ideas that are drowned out in the noise.  What’s worse is that the world is becoming softer in more ways than this.  People are afraid to do almost anything that might cause a stir or make someone uncomfortable.  I’m here to tell you that an argument is not a bad thing and that discomfort is necessary for change.  Arguments (or debates) are very good things for the world.  I have held numerous civil arguments with friends of mine that broaden both our perspectives – and we’re still friends!
           
            While lack of respect is a big part of the problem, I think the biggest problem is that people don’t do anything anymore.  We forsake action for temporary comfort.  But what we ultimately believe is respecting others inadvertently ends with the world only getting further and further from what we believe is right.  It is very possible to do controversial things without disrespecting people.  Certainly, you might step on a few toes, but such is the nature of change in a large society.  Controversial acts are not bad things - they get people thinking.  These newfound actions against illegal immigration might not be what we really need, but they have brought attention to the growing issue of illegal aliens in the states.  Rising issues with homosexual marriage have made people think about what government can and cannot dictate.  The problem with these issues is that they have become highly polarized.  The frankly childish way we have chosen to debate these ideas has caused us to debate more for bragging rights than for the issue itself.  Debates become more and more personal as sides become more and more hostile.  What I am proposing is that we act on our beliefs, but in a respectful way.  Think for yourselves and make known the other side of the story.  Stand up for your point-of-view when the time comes, but respect those you contradict.

            Christians: this means you as well.  We are called to be respectful, but not to be idle.  We are called to stand out from the crowd, but not to hate it.  Likewise, Jesus says on the Sermon on the Mount that “blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth;” but “meek” does not mean “silent.”  Myron Augsburger says in his commentary of Matthew that “Meekness is not weakness; rather it is the gentle spirit, the disciplined or controlled spirit. In Greek the word for meek, praus, is an ethical word. Aristotle spoke of meekness as the mean between anger and indifference. It is a word that denotes self-control, but also means genuine humility.”  Nowhere in the Bible does it say we are to be silent.  Causing controversy as the Church is not a bad thing and as we are called to stand out from the world it is quite expected.  Our faith will make people uncomfortable.  Jesus was not all about making people feel good; He was about bringing glory to God.  We need to stand up for our faith and do so in respectful manner “so that an opponent may be put to shame, having nothing evil to say about us” (Titus 2:8 ESV). 

            So there it is: a call to act and a call to respect.  I ask you to think for yourself and to seek understanding.  I don’t necessarily ask you to believe what I believe, but simply to know what you believe.  Question things and seek knowledge of opposing views.  Respect those who disagree with you and you just might learn something. 

            Thanks for reading!  Go and remember: ignorance is the enemy.


Augsburger, M. S., & Ogilvie, L. J. (1982). Vol. 24: The Preacher's Commentary Series, Volume 24 : Matthew. Formerly The Communicator's Commentary. The Preacher's Commentary series (18). Nashville, Tennessee: Thomas Nelson Inc.                             


I recently did a video component to this blog, so if you want to watch - here it is!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DtFL5gkMeBQ

2 comments:

  1. Great post, Trevdawg! A much-needed rallying cry that I hope stirs the timid from their slack-jawed stupors.

    Yeah, civil debate has fallen on hard times, what with FOX News-style spittle-flecked shouting matches trumping the thoughtful discourses one finds on C-SPAN. A comparison of these two networks' ratings shows what people prefer. But what people need is (A) to be armed with information and (B) the courage of their convictions to step up and speak out about those issue that matter to them. For example, I'm tired of people (even and especially professing Christians!) parroting that tired Seinfeld line of "not that there's anything wrong with it" when the discussion turns to homosexuality. This postmodern relativism, this "I'm OK, you're OK," "can't we all just get along?" fear of conflict is having a chilling effect on debate and discourse.

    I appreciate your closing words: "Ignorance is the enemy." It brought to my mind the old comic strip character Pogo who famously said, "We have met the enemy and he is us." Yeah, I'm as guilty as the next guy in not laying in my supply of intellectual and spiritual ammo necessary to wage this culture war we as believers are everyday waging. I've turned a deaf ear to comments that called for a challenge because I was either unarmed with info or just plain lazy or maybe even infected by this zeitgeist that rewards tolerance and playing well with others. And I know none of those excuses are acceptable from Christians who should be discerning the signs of the times and feeling a sense of urgency to get the uncompromised word out. There's a great, galvanizing line in the Talking Heads song "Life During Wartime": "This ain't no party, this ain't no disco, this ain't no foolin' around!"

    Anyhoo, thanks for the convicting words that I pray God will use to light a fire under those of us sunk low in our chairs ducking conflict. --Gary

    ReplyDelete
  2. Wha, the loud post-modernists are suppressing other people who are just as right as they are?! Why, that is very unpostmodern of them! I might mention that to them and tell them that they know that I am right since we all are right! :) Though arguing with a fool is discouraged in Scripture since fools wont’ listen to you anyway, they think that they are right. Remember the last verse in Judges? Nate’s paraphrase: “And in those days there was no king in Israel, and every man did that which was right in his own eyes.” Post-modernity, in my opinion, just adds a “don’t judge me” to doing whatever is right in our own eyes. If Israel wasn’t obeying the Mosaic Law, then they weren’t obeying God, meaning, they were making their own law to follow, sort of like our contemporary post-modernists.

    I think that post-modernism is a means for people to say “hey, you can’t judge my actions because I am right, and you are right, so leave me be and go do your own thing and stop telling me what I can and can’t do!” The interesting thing to note here is the irony of that statement and Christian post-modernists! Justification for sin says I…

    Glad to see you thinking about this Trevor, it is a thorny issue in Christendom with ugly, ugly ramifications if we embrace it. If Brian McLaren declared a 5 year moratorium on deciding what the official stance is on homosexuality by the emergent church, then it seems clear that they are making their own laws to follow because according to post-modernistic though you are the source of truth and authority for your own life. So, if homosexuality, stealing, murder or whatever else you want to do is not wrong to you, then where does that leave us?

    Meh, I'll just repost my comment from the other pseudo blog site!

    ReplyDelete